Organizaitonal Landscape Analysis

This project is an effort to understand the work of organizations to improve our environment in the Rochester Region. The definition of an “environmental organization” is shifting and an intersectional approach that recognizes the role of the social and natural environment in the work of many organizations is needed. The end result will be a publicly available database of organizations, a better understanding of what is being done to build a more sustainable and just community, and a research process that models community participation and engagement.

Ultimately we hope this project will lead to a more connected environmental movement locally, the application of resources in ways that lead to change for those that need it most, and a shared vision that has been developed and adopted by the community.


  • How can we create an equitable, inclusive, and collaborative local movement?
  • Who are the environmental organizations in the region and how do we identify them?
  • What are their priorities, core activities, strategies, and challenges?
  • How do local organizations define “environmental justice” and “sustainability” and “climate justice”?


In doing this work we aim to adhere to principles and practices that lead to just and equitable solutions. This begins with approaching things from a perspective where community members are equal partners in the research. We will use a broad definition of an environmental organization and an intersectional lens that will ensure equity and inclusivity. 

To better understand who is doing what, where they are doing it, and how they are doing it, a paid research team will use a reflective process of inquiry to establish methods of research. Proposed methods include document review, surveys, and interviews. Relationship building will be central to our approach. 

Project Outputs

This project will produce the following:

  1. Structures for implementing an equitable, inclusive, and collabvorative research process that is driven by best practices.
  2. A description of the movement we are engaging with that includes the concepts of sustaianbility, environmental justice, and climate justice.
  3. A publicly available database of organizations with basic information about their priorities, core activties, strategies, and challenges.
  4. An analysis of the priorities and challenges present in the data from organizations.
  5. A set of materials, printed and digital, that communicate hte key findings of the landscape analysis.

Project Benefits

Shared Definitions
  • Common framework for communication
  • Connect to larger movements nationally and globally
  • Easier to connect around the same issues or across issues
  • Easier to connect with resources
  • Highlight common challenges
  • Illuminate soultions that are working
  • Identify gaps and opportunities
Network Building
  • Collaborative Opportunities
  • Resource sharing

Project Origin

This project began as a conversation between the Rochester Ecology Partners (REP) Board of Directors and representatives from the Rochester Area Community Foundation (RACF). We recognized that a project like this would benefit both organizations as REP, a newly formed organizations seeks to understand where it fits into the ecosystem of local organizations and RACF builds a strategy around sustainability and environmental justice as a program area. For severl months a team of volunteers convend by REP, in collaboration with RACF, worked to develop a proposal for funding and launching the project. The Emil Muller foundation provided inital funding to launch the project. 

Project Team

Principal Investigators

  • Tonya Noel
  • Adrienne Perovich
  • Chris Widmaier

Research Design Team

  • Dr. Kathleeen Donovan
  • Ann Howard, JD
  • Dr. Jane Coggshall McConnochie

Advisory Committee

  • Calvin Eaton
  • Erin Turpin
  • Erin Budd Barry
  • Carter Remy
  • Nathan Hayes
  • Sally Howard
  • Julio Jordan

Project Status

Updated 6/20

We have established a research team, an advisory committee and a growing list of collaborators (reach out if you would like to join us). A research plan has been drafted and a plan for gathering community feedback is being implemented.

The research and advisory teams’ initial discussions were centered around building a culture and processes aligned with the Jimez democratic principles of organizing. Following discussions were about the communities we are attempting to engage and the processes that would best respect their cultures and norms.

Understanding community based participatory research was an important next step and the following definition from the Kellogg Foundation was adapted to our project, “a collaborative process that equitably involves all partners in the research process and recognizes the unique strengths that each brings. CBPR begins with a research topic of importance to the community with the aim of combining knowledge and action for social change to create a more connected environmental movement locally, the application of resources in ways that lead to change for those that need it most, and a shared vision that has been developed and adopted by the community.”

An especially important consideration that emerged was the wide geographic range we are attempting to survey and the diversity of communities across the nine counties. We decided that we would begin with engaging the environmental community in Monroe and Ontario counties and refine our processes as we expanded to neighboring counties. This approach aligns well with our available resources and provides the opportunity to gather more resources as we demonstrate success.
In May our advisory committee considered a draft research plan that outlined the scope of the research and methods that would be in the project. An important question that has emerged over and over since the project started was discussed – How do we identify organizations that are involved in the movement to create a more just and sustainable future?

A decision was made that inclusion in the project will be based on self identification. People will be able to self identify whether or not they have an organization based on a very basic definition of an organization as people working together towards a common goal and whether or not they are members of the community of organizations we are hoping to connect. The latter part of the definition is not as simple. When taking an intersectional approach, it is difficult to put a box around the movement with words like “environmental”. Traditional environmental organizations are narrowly defined and often only refer to nonprofits led by middle and upper class white people. Additionally organizations doing work that aligns with frameworks like environmental justice, just sustainabilities, and just transition don’t capture the full scope of organizations that exist to have a positive impact on human and natural ecosystems. The advisory committee agreed that feedback from the community and additional study was needed before decisions could be made.

The next step is to present the project narrative and research plan to community members in Monroe and Ontario counties for feedback. The research design team will revise the plan according to feedback and present an updated plan to the advisory committee. As the research plan is being finalized, the principal investigators will begin the search for community based researchers beginning with already identified candidates.


Anyone who is interested in getting involved or sharing their thoughts about this project can reach out to

We need:

  • Ideas and feedback about how this project can best benefit the community
  • Letters of support for the project
  • Potential research team members
  • Financial support in the form of grants and donations
  • Organizations that would like to be included in this project